October 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Previous Months






The Astonished Head Tee!
Buttons, Small and Bigger!
Chomskybat Magnet!
Proloxil T-shirts and Mugs!


Ba-Bow
Limerence (Falls In Waves)


Astonished Head: The Ad
Miserable Ovoid Creature


Current
Crygender
The Hacker Crackdown
The Ethics of Ambiguity
The New Goddess
In the Queue
Love and Limerence
A General Theory of Love
Labyrinth of Desire
The Second Sex
Decoding Gender in Science Fiction
Male Bodies, Women's Souls


The Aristocrats
The Blenster's Blog
Classical Values
The Colossus
Exit Zero
Fried Green al-Qaedas
Kate Evans' Blog
Protein Wisdom
Seablogger
Spiced Sass
Ten Fingers 6 Strings
through the moonroof
verb-ops
Virtual Occoquan
Waiting for Cassowary

BMEzine
ErosBlog
Fleshbot
Girl with a one-track mind
ModBlog
Susie Bright


Adventure Cycling
'BentRider Online
crazyguyonabike
Greenspeed USA
HP Velotechnik
Ken Kifer's Bike Pages
Nomadic Research Labs
Northeast Recumbents


boingboing
Dan's Data
Engadget
Gizmodo
Mozilla
Oh Gizmo!
OpenOffice
Slashdot
ThinkGeek
Treehugger
Ubuntu
Ubuntu Forums
Wired



Get Firefox
Opera


May 13, 2002

There have been a slew

There have been a slew of recent articles about the blogging 'phenomenon,' like this one in Salon and this one in Newsweek.

After a few months flitting back and forth between various journalist-style blogs, I can honestly say that I’m glad I don’t do that sort of thing. It may look like I do, but I don’t. Newsweek’s Levy writes that the success of the big big blogs seems to be due to the authors’ “working hard, filling a niche, winning a reputation for accuracy, developing sources and writing felicitously.” I’ll indulge myself enough to lay claim to that last one, but I certainly don’t work very hard, I have no reputation that I know of, and no sources whatsoever. Do I fill a niche? Perhaps. But so does a site that sells inflatable sheep.

At any rate, what I have discovered, after a few months of cranking out various screeds, comments, and semi-considered opinions, is that there’s only so much I can say about an event, only so much attention I can pay to a given political situation, only so many rants that I can expel on a subject before it all starts to blur together. It happens everywhere online, I think. If I have to read one more Horowitzian shriek about the evils of reparations, the lunacy of Noam Chomsky, or the leftward bias of American universities, I’ll just nip off and shoot myself. I get it, David. Now you’re boring.

Similarly, you can pretty much guess where Andrew Sullivan, Glenn Reynolds, or Stephen Green is going to come down on a given issue. Someone like James Lileks is a treasure because he’s got the big funny head and is able to amuse. But by and large, the “blogosphere” seems to be roughly akin to the Mutual Admiration Societies we all knew and loved in high school. The practice of mutual linking effectively raises the Google rankings of various sites, an excellent example of viral cross-marketing.

Me? I am the anti-blogger. In a fit of manic paranoia, I killed Astonished Head last weekend by deleting the index page, just as the Google spiders were trying to index the site. Ha! Take that, you creepy-crawly blog-rolling purveyors of self-aggrandizing punditry! I spit on your haircuts.

At any rate: this is going to get weirder before it gets better, so if you’re into that sort of thing, dear reader, continue visiting.