Whaddya know?
Here's what I wanted him to say:
I know what I'm doing, and when I'm done doing it we will be safer than we are today.
"Whatever action is required, whenever action is necessary, I will defend the freedom and security of the American people."
I paused a moment when I reread my words yesterday: it was the personal "I" that caught my attention. Was that what I wanted? I asked myself. The personal assurance of George W. Bush? But that is, in fact, what he gave to the American people this evening.
What I wanted:
We're going to get him. We're going to get him, and then we're going after the rest of our enemies, and when we're done there won't be a red cent flowing into the coffers of the barbarians.
What I got:
"We will work for a prosperity that is broadly shared … and we will answer every danger and every enemy that threatens the American people."
Close enough.
I wrote:
We're going to put them all down so thoroughly that they'll never, ever get up. The full might of the United States of America is going to be brought to bear...
He said:
"And if war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military—and we will prevail."
Wanted to hear:
...and we will drag their medieval culture kicking and screaming into the 21st century, and teach them to value human life far more than the poetry of a seventh-century merchant-warrior.
Actually heard:
"We also see Iranian citizens risking intimidation and death as they speak out for liberty, human rights, and democracy. Iranians, like all people, have a right to choose their own government, and determine their own destiny — and the United States supports their aspirations to live in freedom."
Again, close enough...not so much with the dragging, kicking, and screaming, but as the President said in the Best Bit of the evening, "The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, it is God's gift to humanity."
Thought would be nice:
Our cause is just, and we will prevail, and you won't have to carry a folding bicycle to work with you anymore.
Am satisfied with:
"If war is forced upon us, we will fight in a just cause and by just means — sparing, in every way we can, the innocent."
He didn't say anything about my bicycle, which was a disappointment. And there was all this domestic stuff he kept talking about, which will no doubt cause much frothing in the punditious sea. But he gave us the date we'll be making our case for war (February 5), reasonable assessments of the threat, and assurances that the threat will be dealt with.
I particularly appreciated the juxtaposition of the export of American compassion--in the form of an outreach to the desperately AIDS-ridden African continent--against the export of American strength and military power. I was also struck by the thought that all of the domestic issues he touched on--tax relief, generous reform of a sophisticated health care system, hydrogen-friggin'-powered cars, and programs to assist those in need--would have seemed like wondrous pipe-dreams to any Iraqi listening in. The things a country can focus on when its leadership doesn't shoot people in the head or strap them to a chair and apply high-voltage electrodes to their genitalia!
Those are just first impressions...more, perhaps, tomorrow.








Whatever else I disagreed with in the smirking chimp's speech, the thing that most made me want to reach into the television and rip out his carotid was the African AIDS relief plan. WHAT ABOUT PREVENTION?? WHAT ABOUT CONDOMS?? Yes, yes, yes, we need to aid those who are already infected. No question about it. But WHY WHY WHY must the chimp administration's bizarre stance on birth control preclude a cheap and effective way to prevent transmission of HIV?
According to the NYT, we (i.e., the US) have been quietly advocating against promoting the use of condoms in Africa. To me, if this is true, this is practically tantamount to advocating genocide.
Posted by: kate | January 29, 2003 12:20 PM
Well, we do have to have the continent cleared out by the time the aliens land, you know.
Seriously--I've heard that theory.
As far as genuine debate, though--the African AIDS outreach sounds great, but that's an entire continent, and dozens of different cultures, we're talking about. The entire budget could be eaten up just buying the infrastructure needed to provide the medication--potable water, refrigeration, adequate training, and on and on. It's an enormously complex problem, and while it's great to see a sitting Republican President make the effort, the practical reality is daunting and grim. Not to mention, of course, our own cultural peculiarities...such as the fact that certain sectors of our government are run by men who haven't quite decided whether sex is evil or not.
But you do have to admit: 1.2 billion for hydrogen-powered cars is pretty kewl.
Posted by: --iaw | January 29, 2003 12:32 PM