I just finished listening to Blix's speech. Short take: expert use of the words "could," "indicate," and "possible."
Then, wonder of wonders, this headline from Reuters: Blix Says Weapons of Mass Destruction Not Accounted For. And right before my eyes, the article headline changed, presto! into: Blix: No Weapons Of Mass Destruction Found. What happened?! Then I saw that the WaPo had changed the story that their front page headline linked to, from a Reuters report to an Associated Press report.
More later (probably).
